Frequently Asked Questions
Contacts
Housing Element Update Team
David Matson, Project Manager: dmatson@co.santa-barbara.ca.us
Bret McNulty: bmcnulty@co.santa-barbara.ca.us
Mike Hackett, Senior Planner: mhackett@co.santa-barbara.ca.us
Kimberly Cover, Associate Planner: kcover@co.santa-barbara.ca.us
General Information
State Housing Law Requirements
Action Phase: Rezone Sites and Proposed Policy Changes
Other Components of the Housing Element
Affordable Housing Programs
General Information
How
often does the county update the Housing
Element?
State law (Government Code § 65580-65584)
mandates that local governments plan
to meet the existing and projected
housing needs of all economic segments
of the community. The law acknowledges
that in order for the private market
to adequately address housing needs
and demand, local governments must
adopt land use plans and regulatory
systems which provide opportunities
for, and do not unduly constrain,
housing development. The state requires that Housing Elements
be updated and certified by the state every five years to capture
the most recent trends in demographics
and employment that may affect existing
and future housing demand and supply.
The Board of Supervisors initally adopted the county's current Housing Element in March 2004, and adopted a revised Housing Element in May 2006. The Housing Element received conditional certification in 2006, pending the adoption of the Housing Element Action Items. The state's
deadline for the 2009-2014 Housing Element cycle is July
2009.
The state does not require the county
to build the housing necessary to meet the community's
need but does require that the county
ensure that adequate
residentially zoned land at appropriate
densities exists and policies
are in place to allow the private market
to meet the housing needs of all economic
segments of the community.
What
is happening now in the Housing Element
update process?
The county is now in the Action Phase
of the 2003-2008 Housing Element. This phase includes environmental review of the
action items identified in the Housing
Element, including affordable housing
programs (changes in development standards and uses in certain zones to facilitate the construction of affordable housing) and the rezoning of at least 62 acres of land to accomodate 16-20 units per acre of multifamily housing. Given the scope of the proposed changes outlined in the Housing Element, the county is conducting a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The first action item addressed in the
Action Phase was the update of the county's
Inclusionary Housing Program (IHP). Changes
to the IHP and associated In-Lieu Fee
Policy were adopted by the Board
of Supervisors on November 23, 2004.
What
is the county trying to accomplish
with the Housing Element?
The goal of the 2003-2008 Housing Element
is to increase the supply of housing
affordable to people who already live
and work in our community while balancing
other important community goals like preserving
quality of life and protecting rural
agricultural land and the environment.
From this goal, the county identified
five guiding principles for updating
Housing Element policies:
- Use remaining vacant and underdeveloped
land efficiently.
- Preserve rural agricultural lands.
- Provide a variety of housing types
to maintain a diverse community.
- Promote quality design and compatibility
with existing neighborhoods.
- Encourage mixed
use and infill development that
supports alternative forms of transportation
What
role does community input play in the
Housing Element update?
Community
input is a very important part of the
Housing Element Update. State
housing law requires that the county
"make a diligent effort to achieve
public participation of all economic
segments of the community in the development
of the housing element" and that this
effort be documented in the Housing
Element that is submitted for state
certification. The public process for the 2003-2008 Housing Element has
included numerous educational workshops
on housing issues in 2001 and 2002
and public workshops on proposed policy
and program amendments and housing
opportunity sites during 2002 and 2003.
(See Public
Participation.) Planning Commission
and Board of Supervisors hearings
to adopt the Housing Element were
held in Spring 2004 and Spring 2006. Opportunities for public involvement in the ongoing Housing Element environmental review process can be found here.
Written public
comment regarding the proposed housing
policies or other issues related
to housing are always accepted. You
can contact staff via mail: Office of Long Range Planning,
30 E. Figueroa St., 2nd Floor, Santa Barbara,
CA, 93101, or e-mail (see above for staff e-mail addresses).
How
do the community plans and the Housing
Element fit together?
The Housing
Element and various community plans,
along with other elements such
as Circulation and Conservation,
together comprise the Santa Barbara
County Comprehensive Plan. State
law requires that the county's general
plan (what we call the Comprehensive
Plan) and its related implementation
tools, such as the zoning ordinances,
form a consistent body of policy
and regulations. No individual
part of the general plan (e.g.,
the Housing Element) is more or
less important than any other part, and all parts must be
consistent with each other. Implementing
tools such as the zoning ordinances
also must be consistent with the
entirety of the general plan. Maintaining
such consistency, in balancing
competing goals such as affordable
housing production and open space
preservation, is one of the foremost
challenges that planners face in
crafting Comprehensive Plan updates
and related ordinances changes.
Whenever a significant change is
proposed in some part of the Comprehensive
Plan such as the Housing Element,
one of two approaches may be taken:
either the new proposed change
must be consistent with all applicable
parts of other adopted plans and
ordinances; or, if some inconsistency
would arise, the various applicable
parts of adopted plans or ordinances
must be changed to be consistent
with the new proposal. Either approach
is sound from both a legal and
public policy standpoint, depending
upon the changing priorities of
federal and state law, the CountyBoard
of Supervisors, and the affected
communities.
What is the relationship between the Housing Element and the Housing Element Implementation Guidelines (HEIG)?
The HEIG is not a policy document, but rather a guide to the policies found in the Housing Element. The HEIG is being revised to reflect this fact.
Who are my
representatives on the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission?
Visit
the Board
of Supervisors and Planning
Commission websites to find out
who your elected representatives are.
How
can I receive notification of upcoming
Housing Element related hearings and
events?
Click here to send
an email indicating whether you'd
like to be contacted via email or standard
mail about Housing Element related
news and upcoming meetings and events
State Housing Law Requirements
What
is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment?
The State Department of Housing and
Community Development (SHCD) provides
each region with its projected increase
in housing need for a seven and a half
year period. This projected regional
need is a portion of the state's housing
goal for the same period. The projection
is articulated in the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared
by Santa Barbara County Association of
Governments (SBCAG). SBCAG divides SHCD's
estimated housing need among the incorporated
cities and the unincorporated areas of
Santa Barbara County. the RHNA identifies
not only the number of housing units
the county must plan for, but also the
required affordability level of those units.
The current RHNA
allocation is for the planning
period from January 2001 to July 2008.
How was the RHNA divided among the county's jurisdictions?
The Santa Barbara County Association
of Governments (SBCAG) divides State
Housing and Community Development Department's
(SHCD's) estimated housing need between
the incorporated cities and the unincorporated
areas of the county. SBCAG uses information
on population, employment, and commute
patterns to allocate the units among
the local jurisdictions. In the unincorporated
areas of the county the units are further
divided among the county's five Housing
Market Areas (HMAs) which include the
SouthCoast, Santa Ynez, Lompoc, Santa
Maria, and Cuyama HMAs. The SBCAG Board
made the decision to assign 49.7 percent
(3,014) of the units allocated to the
unincorporated county to the Santa Maria
HMA. The allocation process and the final
decision are articulated in SBCAG's Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).
RHNA
Allocation, January 2001-July
2008 Unincorporated Santa Barbara
County |
Housing
Market Areas |
Total
Units Allocated |
Percent
of Total |
South
Coast |
1,182
|
19.5%
|
Santa
Maria |
3,014
|
49.7%
|
Santa
Ynez |
724
|
11.9%
|
Lompoc |
1,122
|
18.5%
|
Cuyama |
22
|
0.4%
|
Unincorporated
Area Total |
6,064
|
100.0% |
Source: SBCAG, Adopted December 19, 2002 |
The SBCAG Board is made up of all five
members of the county's Board of Supervisors
and one representative from each of the
incorporated cities in the county (either
the mayor or a city councilperson). This
process began in December 2001 when the
state assigned draft regional housing
need numbers to the Santa Barbara region.
In December 2002, the Board of Supervisors
adopted the RHNA allocations for the
unincorporated area in public hearings.
What
is the penalty for not meeting state
Housing Element requirements?
The consequences
for not having a Housing Element certified
by the State Department of Housing
and Community Development include the
following:
- The state would
withhold housing funding (approximately
$850,000 annually). The county
would be ineligible or not competitive
for grant funding for housing and
transportation. (The county has received
$25 million dollars in grant funds
since 1995.)
- The county would
be open to law suits for not
providing housing for all income
categories (Sacramento County lost
a lawsuit in 1996. The Cities of
Camarillo, Fillmore, and Folsom and
Napa County are currently being sued
by housing advocates for not providing
adequate land for housing). The typical remedies for such law suits include the court ordered implementation of Housing Element policies to meet state certification requirements,
a court imposed moratorium on all development in a jurisdiction,
a court takeover of a planning department in order to process affordable housing projects, and the payment of attorneys fees.
Can the County self-certify its Housing Element ?
No. The state's self-certification program applies only to jurisdictions in San Diego County, and is a pilot program that was established by Assembly Bill 1715 in 1995 (Government Code § 65585.1). The self-certification program does not exempt jurisdictions from meeting all state laws regarding Housing Element compliance. A bill to expand this pilot program to all jurisdictions in California was introduced in the 2005-2006 legislative cycle (AB 549-Salinas), but did not pass.
Action Phase Programs: Rezone Sites and Proposed Policy Changes
What is the environmental review
process for the Action Phase of the Housing
Element?
The county produced a Negative Declaration
(ND) for the Adoption Phase of the
Housing Element. The Action Phase
of the Housing Element is currently under environmental review to evaluate any potential environmental
impacts of the proposed action items
in the Housing Element including
housing program changes and potential
rezones. A draft EIR will
be completed and available for public
review in Summer 2007. (See the Housing Element EIR webpage for more information).
Why does the Housing Element propose to rezone 62 acres of county land to a residential density of 16-20 units per acre?
The
county has adequate residentially
zoned land to accommodate the county's
RHNA allocation of 6,064 units. However,
the land is not zoned at densities
that could accommodate the units
required in the very low, low, and
moderate income categories. Building
affordable units at low densities
is not economically feasible as this
requires very high levels of subsidy.
Higher densities spread the cost
of development across a greater number
of units, which makes very low and
low income units in projects more
economically feasible. Therefore,
the state has required the county to rezone a minimum of 62 acres to higher densities to ensure adequate zoning
is in place to support all affordability
levels. Developers and financers
of affordable housing generally agree
that densities of 16-20 units per
acre are preferred for very low and
low income housing. All of the parcels
proposed to be rezoned are within
urban areas in the county's jurisdiction.
How
were the Housing Opportunity Sites
proposed to be considered for rezoning
to increased residential density
selected?
First, a vacant and
underdeveloped parcel inventory
was created using the CountyAssessor's
database and
GIS mapping technology. Other
sites were proposed by community
members. Sites outside the existing
urban boundaries were eliminated in
order to focus future growth
into areas in proximity to existing
water and sewer districts. Next,
sites which were overly constrained
by biological resources or physical
constraints were eliminated.
These included sites constrained
bysteep slopes, geologic, fire
or flood hazards, and those significantly
constrained by endangered species
habitat. Finally, those remaining
sites in proximity to transit
routes, schools, commercial and
retail centers, parks and recreation
and employment centers were selected
as candidate housing sites. Following
this evaluation, communities
evaluated sites through
various forums and the list of
potential sites was further refined.
In the Winter of 2005-2006, the County Planning Commission, in public hearings,
considered all of the potential
sites and determined which of
the sites should be evaluated
in the environmental impact report
(EIR). They identified 10 sites in the north county to be analyzed inthe Housing Element EIR. Additional sites in the south county and Santa Ynez may be identified as alternative sites, and analyzed in the EIR. Finally,
the Board
of Supervisors will consider
the findings of the EIR, Planning Commission
recommendations, and public comment
before making a final determination
on which sites will be rezoned
to increased residential densities.
These hearings are expected to
take place in Winter
2008.
How will the proposed policy changes in the Housing Element affect land uses in the County?
The changes will allow for higher density housing on some residential and commercial parcels. Higher densities will be achieved through reduced open space on specific parcels, the construction of buildings closer to streets and to each other on specific parcels, and potentially reduced parking requirements. These changes make it more feasible for landowners to develop housing projects that include a percentage of units that can be sold or rented to the very low and low income households in our communities.
How
will compatibility issues be addressed
if new development is built at higher
densities than existing neighborhoods?
The
proposed densities being considered
for rezoned sites (16-20 units/acre)
would allow construction of two- or three-story
wood frame homes similar in scale
to existing housing. Communities
can also achieve higher densities
by filling in the existing developed
areas with second units, duplexes,
and conversion of underutilized commercial
buildings to residential uses. For
specific projects, compatibility
can be achieved through competent
design and review of the site layout
and the structures themselves. "Compatible
with" does not mean that the new
development will be exactly the same as
existing development. The Housing
Element includes a Neighborhood Compatibility
Policy (Policy 5.1) with guidelines
for achieving compatibility with
surrounding development.
Will all housing on rezone sites be affordable?
No, county policy requires that in projects that involve five or more net new units, 20%-30% of the units are to be affordable. Developers also can pay a fee to avoid building affordable units. However, higher density housing is generally more affordable at all income levels.
What
about traffic and parking issues
in higher density development?
Well-designed
"compact" development near public transit
and services actually generates fewer
auto trips per unit than traditional
low density single-family development.
This means fewer cars on the road
as residents of compact development
tend to drive less and walk more.
Studies show that as a project becomes
twice as "compact", residents drive
20 - 30% less. Residents of compact
development also tend to own fewer
cars and need less parking. The problem of an overabundance of
cars parked in residential neighborhoods
is often a consequence of overcrowding - a direct result of the housing
shortage. However, the county parking
requirements will be applied to compact
development as they would any other
type of development, with exceptions
for projects that can demonstrate
a reduced need for parking. These
could include projects for seniors
or projects with good access to public
transportation.The environmental
analysis for the Action Phase of
the Housing Element will examine
potential traffic impacts from the
policy changes and rezones and identify
mitigation measures and alternatives.
The traffic and parking impacts of
individual developments will also
continue to be reviewed on a project-by-project
basis.
Do
higher densities lead to increased
crime?
No.
No study has ever established a link between
increases in crime and housing density.
In fact, density and good design can enhance
safety in a neighborhood by ensuring visibility
and creating a sense of community through
natural interactions and shared spaces.
How
will service constraints to development
be addressed?
The county has met
with local water and sanitary districts
to discuss their ability to provide
service to increased residential
development. Water and sanitary constraints also will
be thoroughly examined in the
environmental analysis for the Action
Phase of the Housing Element.
Does the Housing Element contain policies that apply to housing on rural land or lands zones for agriculture?
Some housing-related policies for rural lands are specifically addressed in the Housing Element under Policy 1.6 and Policy 2.2. Other housing-related policy revisions to the County's agricultural zoning ordinance have been proposed as part of the Uniform Rules Update. Both the Housing Element and the Uniform Rules are currently in the process of environmental review and will contain analysis regarding the potential impacts of these housing policies on rural lands and the agricultural sector.
How
do the policies in the Housing Element
affect rural agricultural land, the
San Marcos foothills, and the Gaviota
Coast?
The
county has and continues to limit
development on rural agricultural
land, the San Marcos foothills,
and the Gaviota Coast. Two of the
guiding principles used in developing
the policies in the Housing Element
were to 1) protect rural agricultural
land and 2) use remaining vacant
and underdeveloped land efficiently
by encouraging mixed use and infill
development in the existing urban
areas of the county.
Will the Housing Element policy changes affect the whole county?
Yes, all parts of unincorporated Santa Barbara County will be subject to the same policy changes.
Other Components of the Housing Element
What
do some of the terms used in the
Housing Element mean?
- Infill
Development: Building homes,
businesses, and public facilities
on vacant and underutilized land
within existing urban areas.
- Mixed
Use: Development that includes
more than one type of use on a single
site. An example is commercial and
residential uses in a shopping center.
- Affordable
Housing: The state defines
affordable housing as housing that
can be purchased or rented by households
whose gross annual household income
does not exceed 120% of Area Median
Income (AMI), adjusted for household
size. Because of the very high cost
of housing in our community, Santa
Barbara County expands this to
include households with income up
to 200% of AMI. This housing may
be subject to a covenant or deed
restriction that restricts sales
price or rent for a given period
of time. This is referred to as "price-restricted"
affordable housing. Other types of
housing such as second units, some
rental apartments, and farm employee
housing may be affordable to households
whose gross annual household income
does not exceed 120% of AMI without
restrictive covenants. This
housing is often referred to as "affordable
by design". If the rents
for these units
are documented at the time
they are permitted they can be counted
toward the county's regional
housing needs allocation as affordable.
- Workforce
Housing: Santa BarbaraCounty
added this category of households
earning 121 to 200% of Area Median
Income (AMI) who also cannot afford
market rate housing due to very
high area home prices.
- Discretionary
Incentives: Some of the county's
proposed programs include incentives
available to developers for building
specified amounts and/or types of
affordable housing. Some of these
incentives are automatically applied
to projects and others are discretionary.
Discretionary incentives require
decision maker approval as part of
the development review process.
- Overpayment: When a household spends more
than 30% of household income on housing
costs including rent
and utilities for renters or principal,
interest, and insurance for owners.
Households that pay more than 50%
of their gross income for housing
are severely overpaying. (State and
federal housing agencies definitions
of overpayment vary between
25 and 30% as the threshold for
overpayment.) In the unincorporated
area of the county, 38.9% of households
overpaid and 18.4 % severely
overpaid for housing as of the 2000
census.
What
is Area Median Income?
The Area
Median Income (AMI) is the median household
income by household size in the county.
The AMI for a household of four in
Santa BarbaraCounty is updated annually
by the federal Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) and is adopted
by the state Department of Housing
and Community Development (SHCD). The
entire county, including the cities
and the unincorporated area use the
same AMI. AMI does not specify the number
of people in a household who could
be wage earners. For example, a four
person household could include two
wage earners supporting two children
or one single parent wage earner with
three children.An adjustment factor
is used to calculate the AMI for different
household sizes. The AMI for 2006 by
household size is as follows:
Area
Median Income for 2006 |
Santa
BarbaraCounty |
Household
Size
|
Area
Median Income |
| 1 |
$46,050 |
| 2 |
$52,650 |
| 3 |
$59,200 |
| 4 |
$65,800 |
| 5
or more |
$71,050 |
Affordable housing
is classified into four categories
based on the percent of the AMI a household
earns. These categories are very low,
low, moderate, and workforce. The AMI
is used to calculate the maximum allowable
income to qualify for affordable housing
in each income category per state law. For 2006 these
are (2007 data will be released in March 2007):
Maximum
Allowable Household Incomes for
2006 |
(by
household size and income category) |
Household
Size
|
Very
Low
|
Low
|
Moderate
|
Workforce
|
(0-50%)
|
(above
50-80%)
|
(above
80-120%) |
(above
120-200%)
|
1
|
$23,050
|
$36,850
|
$55,250
|
$92,100
|
2
|
$26,300
|
$42,100
|
$63,150
|
$105,300
|
3
|
$29,600
|
$47,400
|
$71,050
|
$118,450
|
4
|
$32,900
|
$52,650
|
$78,950
|
$130,600
|
5
or more
|
$35,550
|
$56,850
|
$85,300
|
$142,150
|
What
is "fast track" permit processing?
The
fast track permit process is designed
to help facilitate projects that
include a large number of units at
affordable prices or rents or for
persons with disabilities through
a streamlined permit review and approval
process. Priority is given to fast
track projects and the development
review process is made faster through
a more comprehensive pre-application
review and completion of environmental
review "in-house," or through a consultant
from a pre-qualified list. Fast track permitting
is available to projects that participate
in the Density Bonus, Special Needs
Housing, Rental Housing, and Homeless
Facilities Programs.
Does the Housing Element include incentives to build rental apartment projects?
Housing Element Development Standard 1.7.1 provides direct incentives for 100% rental housing projects. With regard to fee-offsets or credits as a mechanism to encourage rental projects, Long Range Planning does not provide impact fee assessments or process calculations. Rather, our general plan amendments section does analyze the relationship of those fees to the market environment and make recommendations as to future actions to be taken by the Department of Planning and Development.
Affordable Housing Programs
Who
manages affordable housing?
Santa
Barbara County's Housing and
Community Development Department
(CHCD) is responsible for monitoring
all resales, refinances, and transfers
of ownership of homes sold under
the county's Affordable Housing
Program. CHCD also monitors the
homes to make sure that they are owner-occupied
and are not illegally rented out
by the owner. Affordable homes offered
for rent are notmanaged by the
county. Eachhousing development
has a private management companyto
ensure that tenants maintain
the property in accordance with
the rules and regulations established
by the owner of the project. Similarly,
affordable housing units included
in for-sale projects are subject
to the conditions, covenants,
and restrictions (CC&R's) of
the development, which are established
and enforced by a private homeowner's
association.
Why doesn't the county's
Inclusionary Housing Program require
projects to pay fees for all affordable
units rather than requiring some
to be built on-site?
The county's
Inclusionary Housing Program was
updated in November 2004. The program
encourages developers to pay fees
in lieu of making a percentage of
units in the project affordable to
very low and low income households.
The program also encourages developers
to meet moderate and workforce income
requirements by building these units
onsite. This system is in place because almost all
of the affordable housing subsidies
available are for very low and low
income units. The county's Housing
and Community Development Department
(CHCD) has been very successful in
leveraging in-lieu fees to obtain
other funding and build affordable
housing. Since 1994 the county has
used $1.2 million in fees to leverage
an additional $15.7 million and built
164 new housing units. The vast majority
of these units are affordable to
very low and low income households
because almost all of the housing
subsidies available for affordable
housing are targeted toward these
groups. Because minimal subsidies
are available for moderate and workforce
income households CHCD would not
be as effective in producing these
units using in-lieu fees. This is
why county policy encourages these units to be built on-site.
How
does the county ensure that units
remain affordable?
Affordable
units developed under the county's
Inclusionary and Density Bonus Programs
are "price restricted". New for-sale
price restricted units are subject
to covenants that require they remain
affordable for a minimum of 45 years.
If a unit is resold before the 45
year period ends this period restarts
at 45 years for a maximum of 90 years.Rental
units that are price restricted are
also subject to covenants that require
they remain affordable for 45 years.
Rental unit policies are also in
place so that at the end of the 45
year period the county will, whenever
feasible, reinstate the affordability
provisions by buying down the cost
of the rental units using in-lieu
housing funds, federal and state
loans and grants, and other county
or private funds.
How can policy makers and the public assess the success of the County's affordable housing programs (the State Density Bonus Program, the Inclusionary Housing Policy and In-Lieu Fee, and the Affordable Housing Overlay)?
County staff is currently working to establish the causal relationships between the County's affordable housing programs, and to determine the on-the-ground results of these programs to date. These efforts are coordinated between the Office of Long Range Planning, the Housing and Community Development Department and the Planning and Development Department to ensure that the relationships between policy, processing, and implementation/enforcement are understood, properly analyzed, and enforced. County decision makers and staff will consider revisions to all of the County's affordable housing programs in the next Housing Element update cycle (2009-2014).
|