Click logo to go to County homepagePlanning and Development Energy Division  
 [  You Are Here:  County Home : Energy Home :  Division History]
Site Search
Contact Us
 Energy Division Home
 Announcements
 Who We Are
   Mission Statement
   Division Staff
   Division History
   Budget Information
 Oil & Gas Facilities Map
 Projects
 Permit Compliance
 Policies, Rulemaking
 Information
 Mitigation Programs
 Interagency Activities
 Telecommunications
 Links to Other Sites
 Website Page Links
end-section divider

In case of an oil
spill or gas release:

Call 911


Facility Operators
must also call:

Governor's Office of
Emergency Services
1-800-OILS-911


Energy Division
(805)886-7165


Click here for other
reporting requirements
 

Historic Overview of the Energy Division

The Third Decade - Looking Forward (2002 - 2011)


Historic Setting

Several factors will influence the future of offshore oil and gas development over the next decade. Above all else, will oil prices eventually stabilize at a high enough level and for a long enough period of time to stimulate investment in developing existing leases?

Second, new legislation, rulemaking, and results of pending litigation seeking interpretations of existing laws and rules, will likely have a considerable influence on offshore oil and gas. State of California v. Secretary of the Interior Norton may further delineate California's legal authority under the Coastal Zone Management Act to ensure consistency with its coastal protection policies, particularly regarding continual extensions in the life of undeveloped leases. Another recent petition filed against the U.S. Department of the Interior by lessees may also shed more light on the use of lease suspensions to delay expirations of leases during periods of low oil prices. Most recently, U.S. Senator Boxer of California and Senator Landrieu of Louisiana have introduced the California Coastal Protection and Louisiana Energy Enhancement Act for consideration during the 2002 Congressional session. If enacted this bill would cancel the remaining 36 undeveloped oil and gas leases in federal waters offshore Santa Barbara County, compensating lessees with credit to acquire leases in the Gulf of Mexico. As such, oil and gas development offshore Santa Barbara County would be limited to current operations and, potentially, development of fields in state waters such as Tranquillon Ridge and South Elwood.

Third, the characteristics of oil underlying existing undeveloped leases offshore Santa Barbara County is likely to influence the shape of oil and gas development over the next decade. Some, but not all, of the undeveloped offshore oil is known to be ultra-heavy, which poses significant technical, economic, and political challenges to potential producers. Among other things, such characteristics might render development of some reserves unprofitable, given the prevalence of heavy oil produced from onshore fields. Such characteristics may also render the processed oil incompatible for shipment via pipeline to refining centers, instead requiring an unprecedented volume of rail or truck trips.

Additionally, the following trends will help to shape oil and gas development offshore Santa Barbara County. In the context of new leasing activities:

  • The Coastal Sanctuary Act of 1994 will continue to restrict any consideration of new leasing (or expansion in existing lease boundaries) in State Tidelands offshore Santa Barbara County to a very few exceptions. Those exceptions are limited to circumstances where a field underlying a currently leased tract extends beyond the lease boundary.

  • The federal government's moratoria on new oil and gas leasing in specified areas of the Outer Continental Shelf, including all federal waters offshore California extends through mid-2012, and California has strongly expressed opposition to any new federal leasing in offshore waters.

  • The supply of oil from Alaska's currently producing fields to west coast refiners is expected to decline slightly between 1999 and 2020; however projected production from other fields such as the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska is projected to compensate for the decrease. Oil producers have continued to seek more opportunities to tap suspected additional Alaska North Slope oil resources as well as oil and gas resources in other areas of the state, such as opening the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. Meanwhile, interest in opening new areas offshore California has waned considerably since the 1966-1990 period.

In the context of existing producing and non-producing leases:

  • Extended-reach drilling technology continues to break records, and can now reach as far as 4 miles, depending on depth of the field and geologic conditions. Such technological breakthroughs mean that more fields can be developed with substantially fewer drill-sites and at considerably lower cost overall. In most cases, offshore lessees will seek to maximize their use of existing infrastructure to develop the remaining untapped oil and gas fields underlying existing offshore leases. The County will likely field more proposals to develop untapped fields with continually improving extended-reach drilling technology from existing offshore platforms and, perhaps, onshore drill-sites.

  • Conversely, fields that require considerable new infrastructure to develop, including new offshore platforms and onshore processing and transportation facilities, may not prove to be economically recoverable unless oil prices stabilize at a significantly higher price than experience over the last 15 years. In this case, we might expect some more offshore leases to expire.

  • Owners and operators of offshore and onshore oil and gas facilities will likely continue to change as they did during the previous decade, but possibly at a slower pace. Much depends on how attractive of an investment oil and gas offshore Santa Barbara County appears, which, in turn, is highly dependent on the future price of oil and gas. Should low oil prices continue, new investment may dwindle and the financial health of current producers may become a heightened concern, including ability to decommission projects that have been economically displaced.

  • Some offshore platforms in the eastern sector of the Santa Barbara Channel will be ready for decommissioning, and their removal will affect the coastal panorama. Issues about the disposition of these platforms once decommissioned - that is, whether they are sunk offshore or salvaged onshore will likely remain a highly contested issue.

Energy Division Functions

The division's six core functions are expected to remain intact during its third decade; although the level of effort devoted to each function may again shift as described below.

Permit Processing

By the year 2000, processing of permit applications for new oil and gas projects had increased again, albeit at an unsteady rate. Relying on new technological advances in extended-reach drilling, three offshore producers seek to develop oil and gas from untapped fields from existing platforms.

  • In early 2000, Nuevo Energy submitted an application to fully develop the Tranquillon Ridge field.
  • In late 2000, Whiting Petroleum submitted an application to develop the Rocky Point field via extended-reach drilling from Platform Hermosa - originally installed to produce the Point Arguello field.
  • In late 2001, Venoco submitted a revised application to expand its current production of the South Elwood field. The proposed project entails several major changes in its current operations. It also entails several governmental jurisdictions, including the new City of Goleta where Venoco's current oil and gas processing facilities are located, the County of Santa Barbara, the California State Lands Commission, and the California Coastal Commission.

Other potential for new development via extended-reach drilling also exists, and may be proposed in the next decade, depending on the status of undeveloped federal leases in light of proposed legislation and pending litigation.

Processing applications to modify facilities, whether to increase throughput or to update the facilities to operate more economically, will likely continue as a routine component of the division. ExxonMobil's Synergy Project, for instance, entails modifications to increase the efficiency of oil and gas processing in Las Flores Canyon facilities. ConocoPhillips is seeking permits to increase the permitted volume of oil transported in its pipelines. Also, several requests to transfer permits due to a change of owner or operator are pending. The trend of frequent changes in owner and operator may continue into the future, particularly given the unstable nature of oil prices in the foreseeable future.

Permitting activities entailing the decommissioning of oil and gas facilities and remediation of contaminated sites will also likely remain a focus of the Energy Division. Unocal is preparing to abandon its Government Point and Cojo Bay oil facilities. Arguello, Inc. has announced plans to partially decommission its Gaviota oil and gas processing facility. In a few cases, remediation of contaminated soils and water at sites where facilities were decommissioned during the previous decade has carried over into the next decade.

Permit Compliance

The considerable attention devoted to issues of safety during the last few years will likely remain a high priority for permit compliance in the coming decade. The recent introduction of a model Safety, Inspection, Maintenance and Quality Assurance Program (SIMQAP) has resulted in annual safety audits, which result in a list of corrective actions. These audits are intended to reduce the number of incidents that occurred during the previous 10 years.

Additional B-2 Reviews to evaluate the ongoing effectiveness of permit conditions are expected to be prepared as well during this forthcoming decade, beginning with ExxonMobil's facilities in Las Flores Canyon. These reviews will help focus companies and Energy Division staff on those permit requirements that have yet to be completed or fully carried forth. A certain amount of discontinuity occurs when a change in owner or operator of a facility occurs. Occasionally, a new operator finds a somewhat overwhelming challenge to come into compliance with permit requirements, particularily if the previous owner was not diligent on compliance matters. Recent experience has shown a need to focus more resources on compliance to address this discontinuity and reduce it when future changes in owner or operator occur.

Mitigation Programs

The division will continue to administer active mitigation programs and adjust them to respond to new oil and gas projects.

  • The Mineral Management Service, the Energy Division, and the University of California at Santa Barbara are continuing work on the Shoreline Inventory, collecting data to establish a baseline of biological resources so that environmental damage can be fully assessed in the event of an offshore oil spill. The team also is working on a system to consolidate and manage data collected during monitoring.

  • Conclusions of the current research undertaken under the Oak Mitigation Plan will likely reveal improved approaches to mitigating the loss of oak trees during construction of projects. Typical mitigation requires replacement of trees lost during construction. Much of the research is focusing on ways to protect seedlings that are planted as replacements until they are fully established.

The Energy Division will also continue to administer previously established mitigation programs, such as the Coastal Resources Enhancement Fund (CREF), Fisheries Enhancement Fund (FEF), and Local Fishermen's Contingency Fund.

Policy & Rulemaking

In the first two-to-three years, policy and rulemaking activities will continue to focus on the changing nature of the oil industry, abandonment of oil and gas facilities, and the potential for additional offshore oil and gas reserves to be tapped.

  • The Planning Commission recommended a new ordinance to provide a consistent process for approving the transfer of discretionary and ministerial land-use permits when a change in owner, operator, or guarantor occurs. The ordinance applies to oil refineries and oil and gas facilities that support offshore development and are situated within the unincorporated area of the County. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to consider adoption of the ordinance in 2002.

  • In 2002, County decision-makers will consider policies and rules that set forth requirements to ensure and guide the timely and proper abandonment of oil and gas facilities once they permanently cease operations. This policy project focuses on offshore oil and gas fields, related onshore infrastructure and industrial facilities, and oil refineries. The local historic record of timely and proper abandonment reflects very mixed results, ranging from excellent to very poor.

  • In 2002, County decision-makers will consider oil spill thresholds, designed to determine the significance of impacts to the environment, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, in the event of an offshore or onshore oil spill.

  • In 2002, County decision-makers will consider rezoning the former Battles Gas Plant site to a use more compatible with the surrounding rural area in which it is located. This rezone follows the permanent termination and removal of the Battles Gas Plant, which operated between 1937 and 1995.

  • In 2002 or 2003, County decision-makers will consider amendments to the Oil Transportation Policies that reflect significant changes in the transportation system in favor of pipeline. Among other things, this effort will assess any potential technical constraints to shipping ultra-heavy oil via pipeline to refining centers outside the County.

  • In 2003, County decision-makers will consider a new ordinance to specify the amount and type of Financial Assurances required of oil and gas operators to cover potential damages to natural resources and remediation of the environment following oil spills or decommissioning of facilities.

  • The division will also examine its South Coast Consolidation Policies, which are now 15 years old, and recommend any revisions that might be merited to address the changing context of offshore oil and gas development.

  • The division will also prepare a special study that examines the west-coast oil market. It also will consider the range of effects that future offshore oil development might have on marginal onshore oil fields and producers. Many onshore wells have been shut-in for several years, as a result of low oil prices and an oversupply of oil in the west-coast market during the 1990s, while new offshore oil projects were approved for development. The study will address whether or not this same trend would characterize future oil development proposals.

Interagency Coordination

The Interagency Decommissioning Working Group will continue its work to address issues of decommissioning offshore platforms and pipelines after these facilities have permanently ceased operations. The Energy Division will also join an effort undertaken by the Minerals Management Service and United States Geologic Service to inventory natural oil seeps offshore the County, as well as residual oil deposits along the coast that originated from natural oil seeps. Finally, the Energy Division will work with other state and local agencies to update environmental protections for future exploratory activities on offshore federal leases.


Please visit the rest of this web-site to learn more about the Energy Division's current functions and projects

 
end of page content

Top